Bluegill: twelve scenarios, run through the model
Tiny forage, tiny strike zone. Included mostly to show what a size mismatch looks like.
- Optimum
- 24 °C
- Feeds between
- 8–32 °C
- Prey window
- 5–30 mm
- Wants wobble
- 0–3
- Reaction distance
- 0.8 m
- Aggression
- 0.4
- Scenarios
- 12
- Something eaten in
- 0 / 12
The scenario grid
Temperature bands sit on this species' own curve: cold is 13 °C, near optimum is 24 °C, too warm is 29 °C. Each cell links to the full ranking and names the top lure, or how far the best one got if nothing was eaten.
| Temperature | clear · neutral fish | clear · post-front | muddy · neutral fish | muddy · post-front |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold water13 °C | Best: micro crankfollowed, nothing eaten | Best: micro crankignored, nothing eaten | Best: deep divernot detected, nothing eaten | Best: deep divernot detected, nothing eaten |
| Near optimum24 °C | Best: micro crankrefused, nothing eaten | Best: micro crankrefused, nothing eaten | Best: deep diverignored, nothing eaten | Best: deep diverignored, nothing eaten |
| Too warm29 °C | Best: micro crankrefused, nothing eaten | Best: micro crankignored, nothing eaten | Best: deep divernot detected, nothing eaten | Best: deep divernot detected, nothing eaten |
Which archetypes the model favours for bluegill
None. No archetype gets eaten by the bluegill model in any of these twelve scenarios. The scenario pages show where each one fails and the model's fix; the Fish lets you try other conditions and your own builds.
Other species
Species values are working assumptions, not calibrated field measurements. See where this model is wrong.