howfishthink
Species hub

Bluegill: twelve scenarios, run through the model

Tiny forage, tiny strike zone. Included mostly to show what a size mismatch looks like.

Optimum
24 °C
Feeds between
8–32 °C
Prey window
5–30 mm
Wants wobble
0–3
Reaction distance
0.8 m
Aggression
0.4
Scenarios
12
Something eaten in
0 / 12

The scenario grid

Temperature bands sit on this species' own curve: cold is 13 °C, near optimum is 24 °C, too warm is 29 °C. Each cell links to the full ranking and names the top lure, or how far the best one got if nothing was eaten.

Temperatureclear · neutral fishclear · post-frontmuddy · neutral fishmuddy · post-front
Cold water13 °CBest: micro crankfollowed, nothing eatenBest: micro crankignored, nothing eatenBest: deep divernot detected, nothing eatenBest: deep divernot detected, nothing eaten
Near optimum24 °CBest: micro crankrefused, nothing eatenBest: micro crankrefused, nothing eatenBest: deep diverignored, nothing eatenBest: deep diverignored, nothing eaten
Too warm29 °CBest: micro crankrefused, nothing eatenBest: micro crankignored, nothing eatenBest: deep divernot detected, nothing eatenBest: deep divernot detected, nothing eaten

Which archetypes the model favours for bluegill

None. No archetype gets eaten by the bluegill model in any of these twelve scenarios. The scenario pages show where each one fails and the model's fix; the Fish lets you try other conditions and your own builds.

Other species

Species values are working assumptions, not calibrated field measurements. See where this model is wrong.